King & Country Room - Chicago 2017 (2 Viewers)

[King & Country]

An 1903 Is not an 1903A3. It is a model all on it's own with different sights than the 03, A1, or A4. Also Jackson does not carry an '03' He carries a Springfield 1903A4. Thiught you'd have kniwn this as you're the one who made the figure?^&confuse:salute::

And as for it being 'clear' it's not. The rear sights on the rifle are quite odd or it maybe the angle of the photograph.

I own 5 garands and am in the process of creating a Journal discussing all M1 Garand Manufacturers Parts and how they are comparitively different from others. That does not look like a garand rear sight at all.

Scott

You are still wrong Scott ...and stop trying to be a 'smart-arse'!
Andy.

 

[arnhem44mad]

You are still wrong Scott ...and stop trying to be a 'smart-arse'!
Andy.

You keep using that term and rather than face the issue just as you usually do:

Personal attacks.

Change your tune, Andy it's getting old:salute::

You only say that because a younger guy is showing he has knowledge of what he is talking about. I can't see why the older generation, who are often actually the ones who think they know it all, come down hard on the younger ones when they show understanding and knowledge of a certain subject. It's a sad way to act. Take a piece of humble pie and accept that maybe just maybe there are young people such as me who know more about certain subjects than you do.

Scott

 

[arnhem44mad]

You are still wrong Scott ...and stop trying to be a 'smart-arse'!
Andy.

Another thing Andy.

See if you pm'd me or emailed me and asked I would be more than happy to give you info/pics about US weapon specs - What sights go on them, what slings are accurate as your new Tarawa marine radio operator with carbine has a leather sling which would have actually more than likely have been a tan cotton sling. Although i do love the addition of the Leather sling on garand rifles! Well done for that!

I wouldn't even seek payment for any information as helping you get the realistic and historically accurate weapon specs on the figures would be payment enough!

Infact I could help advise you on any aspect of US kit you just have to ask. After all I have hundreds of original photos, years worth of knowledge through using and collecting original items of US WW2 equipment and probably have every single item you put on your US ww2 figures in my collection.

Btw the tan webbing on the figures with m43 jackets is a great touch!

Don't hesitate to ask mate. Getting it right is what's most important.

Scott

 

[ivanmoe]

An 1903 Is not an 1903A3. It is a model all on it's own with different sights than the 03, A1, or A4. Also Jackson does not carry an '03' He carries a Springfield 1903A4. Thiught you'd have kniwn this as you're the one who made

Scott, accurate weapons rendering isn't a hallmark of toy soldiers. Items like rifles and swords are ROUTINELY oversized, particularly in thickness, and lack intricate detail. And I'd note that this isn't just true of KC sets, but those from other, more $$$ manufacturers as well. I'd think that interested parties who'd pondered this reality for a moment, or so, would realize that the deformities in size and proportion are owed to the materials involved, particularly, relatively soft, white metal. There are some very real limitations imposed on the medium by the metal's lack of strength and existing casting techniques. Or are you completely unaware of that fact? Going on and on about it is sort of like complaining about cheese because it constipates it you. If you don't like the stuff, "stop eating it." In other words, if you don't like the modeling of weapons that we see in toy soldiers, stop buying sets that are "armed." If fastidious detail in weapons rendering is your deal, you're never going to be satisfied with what's offered. Don't mean to be terse, but you come across as being either uninformed (which I doubt) or simply trolling the group.

-Moe

 

[jazzeum]

I don't mean to pile on Scott but it seems you and Andy have a difference of opinion and that's fine but I thought your next to last post was not necessary. I think you'd agree that sometimes you do get a tad excited (as do I!).

Brad

 

[OzDigger]

I appreciate accuracy in this hobby and enjoy researching and reading informed comments from other forum members. Improved accuracy and detail costs money which is why K & C and most of the other companies by necessity often favour what looks best over what is correct. Which is why I now choose to ignore most errors, and I've found I enjoy the hobby more. And of course continual "critiques" can become tedious and aggravating for most members, especially when "agendas" are suspected.

 

[Poppo]

The wild west diorama is wonderful!The fort so rich...Many fine details in a short space; the more I see the more I like it. I also like very much the ECW fort! {sm3}

 

[jazzeum]

If you want me to take more photos, just let me know.

Brad

 

[Napoleon1er]

Scott, accurate weapons rendering isn't a hallmark of toy soldiers. Items like rifles and swords are ROUTINELY oversized, particularly in thickness, and lack intricate detail. And I'd note that this isn't just true of KC sets, but those from other, more $$$ manufacturers as well.

I really have to disagree with this. While a number of years ago this may have had some truth to it, I think most manufacturers really put a lot into weapons accuracy. I have talked about it with the folks frown WBritain and I have heard about it from Ready4Action, which is a smaller maker with less resources but the same drive for accuracy. You can see it in the excellent pictures TGM posts of its sculpts, which really show how every detail of tinge weapon has been carefully added.

I think it is a bit of an insult to K&C to say it doesn't try for accuracy. I know Andy does because I notice some incredible detail in areas that I am more knowledgeable about (Napoleonic Wars, Israeli military).

As to this debate, I can't tell anything from the pictures. I think both parties are well intentioned here, and the conflict is more due to a clash of personalities. I collect firearms, but I have yet to pick up a Garand or any type of 1903 (not for lack of desire, for lack of cash). What I will say is that Scott sounds like an excellent resource and Andy runs an excellent company that I know is dedicated to accuracy.

 

[Napoleon1er]

Also, please read the quotations in my signature. I changed it to encourage people to reflect on how they express themselves on here.

 

[29 Let's Go]

Thank you for taking your time to post pictures.

Steve

 

[jazzeum]

Steve, my pleasure. It's fun to do.

Brad

 

[arnhem44mad]

I don't mean to pile on Scott but it seems you and Andy have a difference of opinion and that's fine but I thought your next to last post was not necessary. I think you'd agree that sometimes you do get a tad excited (as do I!).

Brad

I do mate but when someone starts name calling I react...not by name calling but by giving reasonable arguments. But yes I agree.

Scott

 

[Desertkiwi]

You are still wrong Scott ...and stop trying to be a 'smart-arse'!
Andy.

Sadly it's a bit late for that Andy, he's determined to rub your face in it no matter what you say or do.

His first post in his 'return thread' made that very clear.

It's actually very disappointing when a member behaves this way, especially when the forum has run so smoothly for so long.

Age has nothing to do with it Scott, it's all about how you communicate and engage with others.

You may have much to share with the forum, which is great, but if you want to be treated like an adult, then stop behaving like a child.

 

[sammy719]

Another thing Andy.

See if you pm'd me or emailed me and asked I would be more than happy to give you info/pics about US weapon specs - What sights go on them, what slings are accurate as your new Tarawa marine radio operator with carbine has a leather sling which would have actually more than likely have been a tan cotton sling. Although i do love the addition of the Leather sling on garand rifles! Well done for that!

I wouldn't even seek payment for any information as helping you get the realistic and historically accurate weapon specs on the figures would be payment enough!

Infact I could help advise you on any aspect of US kit you just have to ask. After all I have hundreds of original photos, years worth of knowledge through using and collecting original items of US WW2 equipment and probably have every single item you put on your US ww2 figures in my collection.

Btw the tan webbing on the figures with m43 jackets is a great touch!

Don't hesitate to ask mate. Getting it right is what's most important.

Scott

Young Buck, you have a lot to learn in life, coming off as a Historical Auntrapenuer isn't your cup o tea as they say, I certainly understand there is always critique be it good or bad, but in your case it surely looks like you have a personal axe to grind with Andy.....one minute your loving new sets and releases the next minute you're telling him how to run a business?? I saw the new "Saving Private Ryan" sets today and they are fantastic!!! So much I bought the set and pre-ordered the next set....dude, always good to have young blood in this hobby but even better to have a slice of humble pie when expressing your wealth of knowledge.

 

[arnhem44mad]

Young Buck, you have a lot to learn in life, coming off as a Historical Auntrapenuer isn't your cup o tea as they say, I certainly understand there is always critique be it good or bad, but in your case it surely looks like you have a personal axe to grind with Andy.....one minute your loving new sets and releases the next minute you're telling him how to run a business?? I saw the new "Saving Private Ryan" sets today and they are fantastic!!! So much I bought the set and pre-ordered the next set....dude, always good to have young blood in this hobby but even better to have a slice of humble pie when expressing your wealth of knowledge.

Sorry mate, but who are you to tell me what I have and haven't to learn? Had you read the full post you'd realise that I did nothing but defend myself and make a suggestion. And that's great, I'm happy for you. I may add them too but probably not as I don't tend to buy the film/fantasy figures.

Scott

 

[sammy719]

Back to show....I certainly enjoy the sculpting and painting of the new Tarawa sets as well as the SPR, had a chat with Andy on the SPR series and I believe it will be great series to collect, I have a ton of photos but Brad has covered most of the pics and I'm still in learn mode to post to treefrog from this phone, I'll post them later next week as there were some great displays.

 

[Desertkiwi]

Back to show....I certainly enjoy the sculpting and painting of the new Tarawa sets as well as the SPR, had a chat with Andy on the SPR series and I believe it will be great series to collect, I have a ton of photos but Brad has covered most of the pics and I'm still in learn mode to post to treefrog from this phone, I'll post them later next week as there were some great displays.

Cheers Sammy and thanks again to everyone taking the time to post snaps from the show, it's much appreciated.:salute::

 

[arnhem44mad]

Back to show....I certainly enjoy the sculpting and painting of the new Tarawa sets as well as the SPR, had a chat with Andy on the SPR series and I believe it will be great series to collect, I have a ton of photos but Brad has covered most of the pics and I'm still in learn mode to post to treefrog from this phone, I'll post them later next week as there were some great displays.

Any word on what unit the new US figures represent?

M43s so something late war - 44 onwards? They may be able to be used in a US paratrooper during Market Garden type scenario!

Scott

Scott

 

[sammy719]

Cheers Sammy and thanks again to everyone taking the time to post snaps from the show, it's much appreciated.:salute::

Thanks Toddy, Brad has done a killer job covering a lot of rooms but I'll get my pix posted first chance.