maddadicus
2nd Lieutenant
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2006
- Messages
- 3,333
It's not at all a distinction without a difference. Whether or not Brady was involved with deflating footballs is besides the question. After reading further, the question is whether Goodell exceeded his authority under the CBA and the Court found that he did. Moreover, the Court found that the NFL didn't make him aware that he could be suspended for four games; it's a question of due process under the law.
Goodell is allowed to suspend players, but within the bounds of the CBA and pursuant to due process. He is not free to act at will or autocratically.
So this means that the NFL cannot ever punish cheaters, which Brady and the Patriots are. So now every game played could be suspect in a wild west without consequences. George, this ruling never absolved Brady of the deed, but that he could not be punished as ordered.. All this means is thet your poster boy for lying, cheating, stealing Super Bowl rings got away with the deed..Michael