johnnybach
Major General
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Messages
- 13,663
It's a "Standard" Jonny, not a "Colour" (just being picky) I'm with you on the turn of the century uniforms.
Martin
As soon as I'd put that word "Colour" in - I thought to myself - now someone's going to pick me up on that, and I did wonder who it might be. ^&grin True - it is a Standard - and I faithfully copied it ( as best I could, at that size) from a picture found on the Internet ( what would we do without it now!). [It's made from a piece of Blister Pack from a packet of pills - and a piece of rod from a "Sparkler", with a small blob of milliput to finish it off], so a low cost transformation.{sm3}
The Standard was used in a similar way as a Colour though - and I thought it would be clearer for some, to use that term.
Here he is again - note that I couldn't manage to get the number of battle honours absolutely correct for the time, as my brush was too big, and I couldn't find another, at the time! BUT mine are never intended to be true "military models" - they are Glossy Toy Soldiers - so as they are just for me - I don't mind if they are not EXACTLY correct in every detail.
For me - it's the overall look and feel for a piece that's important - not the number of buttons on the tunic, or wording on battle honours etc,. I've seen some modern figures, that try and put EVERY button in the correct place - but when they have been painted - all you can see is a straight "BAR" of gold paint down the front of the uniform. Better to get a feel for separate buttons - by reducing the actual number, I think. The problem gets even worse at 30mm!!!
Just a shame that all of the "Bean Counters" in supply, since WW1, didn't continue the same traditions - and retain a really smart set of No.1's for ALL Regiments, instead of the favoured few (Households) - though nowadays, there seem to be fewer and fewer lads who will be requiring ANY uniforms at all, I s'pose.
Glad you didn't disappoint me{sm4} jb
Last edited: