It actually took me awhile to find the guys in the ditch. It looks good. Really like it. Nice to use the KT as part of the background. As you do your own backgrounds, I wonder whether you could integrate vehicles into the background to double the number of vehicles you actually have. But that would probably require going back to digital backgrounds.
And as Matt would say: „And the figures aren’t half bad either.“
i must admit, after many years without vehicles, FL seems to play catch-up. WWII again has become one of their most prolific ranges. Unfortunately, I cannot keep up with vehicle purchases (there are now three in my wishlist). In addition, I cannot keep up with space requirements as I do not put more than one vehicle on a shelf (small shelf). It is a nice problem to have of course. But then, it is still a problem.
i blame Frank’s pictures quite a bit for that problem. The sub range that is lingering in my opinion is the late war subrange. I think it lacks a certain focus. Hence, Frank, please do not touch that one.
i had assumed that at some point, Matt would totally discontinue the use of battles for WWII to define sub-ranges. He got a lot of criticism to label the winter Tigers BB and the Sturmgeschütz NOR, but as he pointed out, there is just no subrange covering the gaps from Normandy to BoB and the period after BoB. Today, he would probably put the Tigers into the Late War subrange.