nysoldiers
Command Sergeant Major
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,372
I have always agreed that the "opinion reporting" and "punditry" is way overdone. But there is still plenty of good factual reporting if you know where to look and can differentiate and weed out the biased reporting. Personally I enjoy hearing some commentary from guests who are experts and experienced in particular news related subjects......elected officials from all sides of the political spectrum, former government administrators, retired military and law enforcement leaders, health experts and on the scene reporters.How true how true. I remember those days of news too. The problem IMO came about when 24hr news networks started to "outrate" network shows and literally the advertising on them is more expensive than most tv programs. That tells you what people are watching.
I have a near 16 year old who was formerly a broadway kid, actor with IMO incredible talent musically as well as intelligence. He told us 8 years ago he wanted to be a broadcast journalist and still does, in fact now its 100% and the drive of what he is looking for in college and internships. Now, my initial reaction 8 years ago was yeah right, concentrate on going to law school. Now, it is hard to argue with his choice, his chance of making a better than decent living as a broadcast journalist is huge, probably better than me (CPA) or a lawyer. How times have changed, they really have.
TD
My family and I were very trusting of the news (Wintchell, Cronkite, Brinkley, etc,,) until the Vietnam War when reporting was hindered by government lies and coverups. We talked to family members and friends who came back from Vietnam to get a better perspective.
Bottom line is that the consumer of news must be alert, willing to listen and read from several sources, critical of commentary from known sycophants and conspiracy theory pundits and willing to do some research on their own.
I remember some of my teachers in middle school and high school who taught history (social studies). It was mostly "facts", dates, names, winners and losers which we forgot right after the exams. Some teachers gave more in depth explanations which made it more interesting. In college professors would add their take on an historical event and we could debate their perspective. The same goes for the news today, having qualified people give their opinions and perspectives can be helpful and enlightening. But we have to understand their biases and experiences.
Studies show that most people go to the news source that fits their preconceived political position. They refuse to listen to a contrary position, this is where "tribalism" takes hold. Unfortunately that is the real problem in todays' hyper partisan society.
I find some reporters more credible so I try follow them and stay away from the "entertainers" and hate mongers. I have been watching "I24" which although an Israeli based network seems to report world news more objectively.
Maybe some of our members can recommend those reporters or outlets that they find more credible.