trooper
Command Sergeant Major
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 2,173
As I understand it, the first person who died in this affair was shot by the police. Since a major catalyst of these riots was (perceived) police corruption and abuse, I, like Damian, fail to see how encouraging police to crack down even harder on these depressed communities will achieve anything except lead to a further vicious cycle of violence on both sides not to mention further accelerate the slide into a 1984 big brother police state which harms the privacy and freedoms of law abiding citizens more than it does criminals. According to this article, five years ago there was already 1 CCTV for every 14 British citizens: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6108496.stm.
After witnessing the brutal police crackdown on peaceful political protesters in Toronto in 2010, I wonder if nonviolent political protest will be the next thing to be outlawed out of fears it could spiral into a riot? And at that point will any trace of our Western democracy remain?
I simply caution that media inflated panic over "threats" often lead to the assigning of undemocratic powers to those who will consciously or unconsciously abuse them - The Patriot Act, for example.
Again, the root issue comes back to why so many young people have suddenly turned into "opportunistic thugs" as you and Mr. Cameron like to call them. I wonder if their pursuit of material consumption at the expense of society could have anything to do with the like-for-like example set by our role models in the upper echelons of society? http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/p...r-society-is-as-bad-at-the-top-as-the-bottom/
To me, these are two sides of the same coin, especially because the thievery of the one has necessitated the austerity cuts in social spending that help motivate the thievery of the other. But I wonder why our "justice" system is totally missing in action when it comes to holding the bankers and other corporate thieves accountable? We know their names, we know their faces, yet they remain untouchables, above the law.
I agree with a lot of the above, however there are a few points that need clarification. First, the man shot by the police was armed with a loaded weapon, not an "innocent". Secondly many of those arrested come from a far from deprived life. One was a millionaires daughter, another a care assistant, university students etc. Thirdly the attitude of some of the rioters expressed and caught on TV "we can do what we want", "let's get some of that". In court one of them broke down crying that this sentence would mean him losing his job and possibly his home, this from someone who had been in a mob torching buisnesses with flats above leaving the occupants with nothing but the clothes they stood up in. I agree that the example set by the bankers and politicians in the recent expenses scandle set a bad example, but I think your fears of non violent protest being outlawed are groundless. But when protest escalates into violence and criminality then the protesters need to be taught that lawlessness comes with a price. In the words of the old time crooks, "if you can't do the time, don't do the crime". Trooper