wayne556517
Lieutenant General
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
- Messages
- 16,184
Brilliant show enjoying it, no need to compare to other shows as it is a whole different theatre.
I find this series fascinating, poignant and well done. Here is an interesting article and overview as published in FLYING Magazine.
https://www.flyingmag.com/masters-of-the-air-miniseries-is-must-see-tv-for-aviation-buffs/
I enjoyed the series, however I'm going to go out on a limb here........
I felt it was rushed and deserved at least a couple more episodes and more character development.
The anti Brit episode was un-necessary and IMO disrespectful, given the circumstances and topic and sacrifices by all allied airmen.
I also found the Jewish reference's un-necessary and the comment about 'Palestine' completely PC nonsense.
As for the episodes including the Tuskegee airmen I'm in two minds as to why they were singled out for this series.......
Just my five cents.......
I recently added Apple TV to my increasing list of streaming aps to check out Masters of the Air and catch up on the latest season of Slow Horses, an MI5 based series which I can highly recommend.
Firstly, why call the series Masters of the Air, I don't think any Allied Aircrew would have felt they were Masters of the Air over Germany, especially earlier in the European Air War. And of course there were the usual myths, e.g. the 'amazing' Norden Bombsight and B-17 Airgunners shooting down heaps of fighters, reminded me of the old 12 O'clock High TV series. It's well documented that the Brits and Germans had better Bombsights, the Germans already had examples of the Norden and considered it inferior to theirs.
Allied Bombers (Day and Night) rarely shot down German Fighters, especially in head on attacks which they tended to use against B-17s. Those 1/2 inch Brownings packed some punch, but I suspect they were more dangerous to other bombers than any enemy fighters. And of course there was the usual 'British' Night Vs US Day bombing argument, plus the now usual PC input. And don't get me started on any Lancaster Vs B-17 debate :wink2: ^&grin
Sooo, pretty much what I expected. However, as the series progressed I grew to appreciate how incredibly brave those guys were, they were often young and inexperienced crew led by young and inexperienced officers, and like the crews in Sherman tanks, they just kept coming at the Germans until the end :salute::
While not disagreeing with your post regarding German fighter casualties I would point out later B-17 models such as the G, had chin turrets.
Great series and glad they told the story of the air war. But the series lost a lot of credibility for me with the POW camp liberation fantasy scenes. I didn't have to read the book twice, which I did, to know this was pure Hollywood.
Agreed, however I am still thankful that the U.S. series was produced, the Allied WW2 Bombing Campaign was one of the first casualties in the Political Correctness Battles. It's now like it never happened in Australia, and to a lesser degree in the U.K. I've started watching the series again as I was doing other things when I first watched it, I do tend to multitask.
I'm with you and found the aerial scenes well done, CGI is most improved. I liked that they highlighted the food relief missions to Holland. Twenty thousand people died of starvation and millions were impacted, including Audrey Hepburn. We turned the harbingers of death into angels of mercy. A fitting end to the air war.