Mitch
Major General
- Joined
- May 1, 2010
- Messages
- 13,519
Full circle as we have somewhat moved on. the issue, clearly here was that some of the CS releases are 1/30th and some are 1/28th. Many collectors myself and Michal included can notice this and, measurements don't add up whatever the explanation is that's given.
CS need I suppose to decide really once and for all where they stand on the scale and size issue and what it is and, stick with it. Its been with them since they began in the hobby where they made larger figures, collectors noted this wanted them in line with K&C and, this was changed with the DAK range. Its interesting though to note the scale differences even in that range existed between the 88mm gun and, the Panzer I and kettenkraftrad.
There were other issues including the release of the first Tiger variants which, IMO were rather closer to 1/30th than even Brian accepted and, sadly, it has continued and, with the next Tiger where allsorts of explanations were given as to its accuracy at 1/30th scale. This was not the case and, many collectors noted that.
Its not a dig raising these points its also not a dig at the paint style and detail that's different this is about a product that I have collected from nigh enough day one, still collect in terms of LAH that has been linked with scale issues from day one.
Its not about industry compatibility for me as there are so many different paint and personal styles within each manufacturer that are really a individuals taste but, knowing that within one range all AFV's and artillery will be the same scale.
The rest is just nonsense and rattle throwing from the pram and, whilst I opine about what I don't like I would say that even if I don't like a range I can still see what attracts others to it and don't think any of the stuff in the hobby is junk, overpriced or, otherwise,
Mitch
CS need I suppose to decide really once and for all where they stand on the scale and size issue and what it is and, stick with it. Its been with them since they began in the hobby where they made larger figures, collectors noted this wanted them in line with K&C and, this was changed with the DAK range. Its interesting though to note the scale differences even in that range existed between the 88mm gun and, the Panzer I and kettenkraftrad.
There were other issues including the release of the first Tiger variants which, IMO were rather closer to 1/30th than even Brian accepted and, sadly, it has continued and, with the next Tiger where allsorts of explanations were given as to its accuracy at 1/30th scale. This was not the case and, many collectors noted that.
Its not a dig raising these points its also not a dig at the paint style and detail that's different this is about a product that I have collected from nigh enough day one, still collect in terms of LAH that has been linked with scale issues from day one.
Its not about industry compatibility for me as there are so many different paint and personal styles within each manufacturer that are really a individuals taste but, knowing that within one range all AFV's and artillery will be the same scale.
The rest is just nonsense and rattle throwing from the pram and, whilst I opine about what I don't like I would say that even if I don't like a range I can still see what attracts others to it and don't think any of the stuff in the hobby is junk, overpriced or, otherwise,
Mitch