James Flexner's series on Washington is excellent, too. It was the main source used for the screenplay of the miniseries that aired back in the late 70s or early 80s, with Barry Bostwick as the General.
Prost!
Brad
I too have started to read that book. It reads to me like the man has an agenda and that being that he is the only that has discovered the true story of the battle and every other source except the ones he uses of course are twisted and manipulated to make the battle more heroic for the defenders. I will finish it anyway, eventually. I doubt that I will find it more credible then the other sources who have written about the Alamo.It might as well be. I can be sure that this book is not for sale in the Alamo gift shop, maybe not in the state of Texas. He believes that up to 120 of the defenders fled the fort and were caught and killed outside by the Mexican cavalry. Also, the author believes there was no real fight at the walls as the garrison was caught asleep by the pre-dawn assault. Brief fighting in the interior with most of the killing done outside. Battle lasted 20 minutes with the Mexicans suffering less than 300 total casualties (around 6o dead) and most of these were friendly fire. It is not your daddy's history. -- Al
The author certainly has his viewpoint and isn't very subtle about dismantling the various aspects of the battle. As I have read this book, I found that the author has made a good argument and done his homework, but as you pointed out, he seems to believe that his view is the only correct one, totally throwing 175 years of written history to the winds. EVERY other history to this point (while conceding Huffines had some of the story correct in his book "Blood of Noble Men") has major errors in virtually every aspect of the battle. Still, it is an interesting read, if just for his viewpoints, but it did raise my blood pressure some. -- AlI too have started to read that book. It reads to me like the man has an agenda and that being that he is the only that has discovered the true story of the battle and every other source except the ones he uses of course are twisted and manipulated to make the battle more heroic for the defenders. I will finish it anyway, eventually. I doubt that I will find it more credible then the other sources who have written about the Alamo.
I'm sure some guys tried to run away, but he was virtually the entire garrsion heading for the hills. I believe there is some little bit of truth in every version of the events, the trick is finding what is true and what is exaggerated or false. I probably will never accomplish this, nor probally will anyone else.The author certainly has his viewpoint and isn't very subtle about dismantling the various aspects of the battle. As I have read this book, I found that the author has made a good argument and done his homework, but as you pointed out, he seems to believe that his view is the only correct one, totally throwing 175 years of written history to the winds. EVERY other history to this point (while conceding Huffines had some of the story correct in his book "Blood of Noble Men") has major errors in virtually every aspect of the battle. Still, it is an interesting read, if just for his viewpoints, but it did raise my blood pressure some. -- Al
I agree. So many years after the event, with only the victors surviving and having left, in some cases, widely differing versions of the event, finding the truth is, at best, a matter of meeting in the middle. There is always the possibility of new accounts being discovered in the future, but they will also have to be fitted into what is known currently. History is a minefield of the unknown, especially where the Alamo seems to be concerned. -- AlI'm sure some guys tried to run away, but he was virtually the entire garrsion heading for the hills. I believe there is some little bit of truth in every version of the events, the trick is finding what is true and what is exaggerated or false. I probably will never accomplish this, nor probally will anyone else.
I guess that is one of the reasons the Alamo and Custer are so popular, everyone can theorize and speculate and no one can prove them wrong. Plus you can always throw in the what "ifs", and this makes the subjects all the more fascinating.I agree. So many years after the event, with only the victors surviving and having left, in some cases, widely differing versions of the event, finding the truth is, at best, a matter of meeting in the middle. There is always the possibility of new accounts being discovered in the future, but they will also have to be fitted into what is known currently. History is a minefield of the unknown, especially where the Alamo seems to be concerned. -- Al
With all the great Washington bios available, I'm just curious, has anyone ever read D.S. Freeman's 8 volume history on Washington, and what did you think of it? I have never read it, nor do I know anyone who has. -- Al
Good job. I read the Lee bio in college and liked it. If the Washington bio was as good, it has to be one of the best done. Congrats on reading that massive work. -- AlI read first seven vol (thru rev war) many yrs ago. Great detail and same as RE Lee by Freeman, if you've read that series. Freeman died before writing final volume and it was written by his associates.
I read first seven vol (thru rev war) many yrs ago. Great detail and same as RE Lee by Freeman, if you've read that series. Freeman died before writing final volume and it was written by his associates.
Have read it, back in 1974, as my wife (then girlfriend), gave the set to me as a gift Christmas 1973. Was a great read and I also need to re-read it at this point. Still have the set in as issued condition and it has pride of place in my collection of military history books. Used to have the R.E. Lee set but it is gone as it didn't have the emotional attachment as LL's. -- AlTalk of DS Freeman promted me to look up his biography. Son of a Confederate, Phd at age 22, only copy of his dissertation lost in a fire. Won two Pulitzers, for bios of Lee and Washington. Newspaper editor at age 29.
So, who has read Lee's Lieutenants? Thoroughly enjoyed this 3 vol set, again many yrs ago but think it holds up well as an authoritative source for ACW. It moved quickly for me and it's on my "list to re-read" someday.
Only turned up this morning and haven't started reading this yet but having a good flick through - seems just what the doctor ordered.
Jeff
Read GO STRONG INTO THE DESERT from cover to cover, has become my bible for all things Sudan. Lots of pictures every page and well written, 215 pages. Cheers, Robin.
Only turned up this morning and haven't started reading this yet but having a good flick through - seems just what the doctor ordered.
Jeff
Read GO STRONG INTO THE DESERT from cover to cover, has become my bible for all things Sudan. Lots of pictures every page and well written, 215 pages. Cheers, Robin.
I'm glad the Perrys produced this, it's about time all the information was pulled together in one book. A lot of the uniforms have been covered in military modelling magazine, and the like, over the years but not easily accesible without a good reference collection, until now!
Martin