I must say, this is shockingly realistic in terms of the combat itself but especially in regards to the aftermath. The last picture is just plain tragic to view. It conveys the utter slaughter like nothing I have ever seen or thought possible within this hobby. The most stunning of your many excellent works. Thanks. -- Al
Absolutely awesome work Bob, in my humble opinion your best ever!!!!!!.....Also tragically realistic, it really brings home the horrific loss of lives...North and South.
Steve
Bob, I agree with Al and Steve - your best yet! {bravo}} Must have taken many hours to set up and photograph - thanks for taking the time.
Jeff :salute::
I also agree; the mule shoe and the climax of Barkdale's charge were my two favorites of yours, this one moves to the head of the class, brilliant in every way.
It's one thing to set up a diorama, it's another to move and change the figures to tell the story from the beginning of the attack till the end.
Just a few questions Bob; how many figures did you use in this one, how large is the actual diorama and roughly from start to finish how long did this one take?
Thanks for taking the time to plan, research, set up, stage and move this one along for all of us to enjoy.
I await your "Millers Cornfield" diorama which I am sure you are planning, hope to see that one before Christmas, an early present for us all if that is the case.............
George
I must have used maybe 2-250 different posed figures in the whole set-up although I only posted 20 pictures-most of the figures you can see but a few disappeared off screen-my battlefield/workbench is about eight feet by four. On this occasion I divided it into three for different views of the fight and reversed the set up for the Federal enfilade attack. Whole thing took about a month working on it most nights for about an hour a time. It becomes really time consuming when you start shooting pictures-what looks good to the eye sometimes does not come out in the printed shot-so back to the battlefield and turn one figure this way or that or even throw him out as not fitting the scene and replace him with a different pose and so on until it roughly fits the text one intends to write to explain what the hell is going on or what I'm trying to depict.
Then it gets tougher on what pictures you're going to post and which ones end up on the cutting room floor as an example I loved these two shots but the ones posted I thought slightly reflected the story better.
Thanks again guys its a pleasure portraying a period of history I am passionate about but its give me a real filip that its also entertaining a few of you on the forum. Much appreciated
Bob
The pics are one thing but your knowledge of the subject matter is another. Alex
Thanks for all your comments guys.
The last picture in the story was always going to be controversial as I'm only too aware that some forum members are not that keen on casualty figures. However, when it comes to Antietam it did not get the title of "the bloodiest single day in American history" for just being a scrap in a Maryland field. If you do the maths 45 men-on average were killed or maimed every minute for a straight ten hours.
Attached are a photo and artists sketch soon after the battle in "bloody lane"
Old Bobby Lee was a quiet serene God loving man but when he was on a battlefield he became one of the fiercest and most aggressive warriors in history. The way he gambled with his ANV would have terrified even high stake poker players. So it was at Antietam and although the Miller's cornfield bloodfest has got the most historical headlines I always thought the "bloody lane" fight was equal to that carnage but is usually dealt with in history books with just a few short pages. My humble attempt to put the record straight using our forum.
George
I must have used maybe 2-250 different posed figures in the whole set-up although I only posted 20 pictures-most of the figures you can see but a few disappeared off screen-my battlefield/workbench is about eight feet by four. On this occasion I divided it into three for different views of the fight and reversed the set up for the Federal enfilade attack. Whole thing took about a month working on it most nights for about an hour a time. It becomes really time consuming when you start shooting pictures-what looks good to the eye sometimes does not come out in the printed shot-so back to the battlefield and turn one figure this way or that or even throw him out as not fitting the scene and replace him with a different pose and so on until it roughly fits the text one intends to write to explain what the hell is going on or what I'm trying to depict.
Then it gets tougher on what pictures you're going to post and which ones end up on the cutting room floor as an example I loved these two shots but the ones posted I thought slightly reflected the story better.
Thanks again guys its a pleasure portraying a period of history I am passionate about but its give me a real filip that its also entertaining a few of you on the forum. Much appreciated
Bob